{"id":698,"date":"2021-06-09T09:19:26","date_gmt":"2021-06-09T06:19:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dukva.org\/en\/?p=698"},"modified":"2021-06-09T14:13:43","modified_gmt":"2021-06-09T11:13:43","slug":"cambridge-professor-whose-role-was-funded-by-china-cautioned-against-uyghur-debate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dukva.org\/en\/cambridge-professor-whose-role-was-funded-by-china-cautioned-against-uyghur-debate\/","title":{"rendered":"CAMBRIDGE PROFESSOR WHOSE ROLE WAS \u2018FUNDED BY CHINA\u2019 CAUTIONED AGAINST UYGHUR DEBATE"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.opendemocracy.net\/en\/dark-money-investigations\/cambridge-professor-role-funded-by-china-cautioned-uyghur-debate-peter-nolan\/\">Open Democracy<\/a>.&nbsp;5 June 2021<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"alignleft\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.uyghurcongress.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/06\/unnamed-2021-06-09T091227.524.jpg?resize=185%2C124&amp;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-44644\"\/><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Below is an article published by&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.opendemocracy.net\/en\/dark-money-investigations\/cambridge-professor-role-funded-by-china-cautioned-uyghur-debate-peter-nolan\/\">Open Democracy<\/a>. Photo:Robert Evans \/ Alamy Stock Photo.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ACambridge professor, who took a role allegedly funded by the family of China\u2019s former prime minister, has cautioned students against holding debates on Uyghur human rights abuses, openDemocracy can reveal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Professor Peter Nolan said it would be \u201cdifficult to contain the sentiment\u201d about the discussion, in which \u201cboth sides\u201d would need to be represented. He explained that a contentious outcome would not be \u201chelpful to advancing mutual understanding\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<!--more-->\n\n\n\n<p>In a transcript of a private meeting obtained by openDemocracy and shared with the Sunday Times, Nolan said: \u201cIt is not the case that there is a homogeneous, correct view of what is happening in Xinjiang.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>He suggested that questions surrounding the treatment of Uyghurs were \u201cquestions that affect all countries that have any kind of minority at all\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>His comments have been described as \u201cutterly wrong\u201d by the former Conservative leader, Iain Duncan Smith, who said Nolan seems to be a mouthpiece for the Chinese Communist Party.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Jesus College, where Nolan is based, has&nbsp;deep financial ties&nbsp;with China \u2013 including a \u00a3200,000 grant from the Chinese government in 2018 to its Global Issues Dialogue Centre (GIDC). It has also accepted \u00a3155,000 of funding from Chinese technology company Huawei.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Last year, the company was&nbsp;accused&nbsp;of \u201creputation laundering\u201d after it funded a study by Jesus College which presented the company in a favourable light.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nolan himself has previously made headlines about his role as Chong Hua Chair at the university\u2019s Centre of Development Studies. The role was funded by a \u00a33.7m donation in 2012 from the Chong Hua Foundation, which was&nbsp;allegedly&nbsp;controlled by the daughter of China\u2019s former prime minister, Wen Jiabao.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reports&nbsp;claim that Nolan had been her professor at Cambridge and the funding was secured after a series of secret meetings in Beijing between 2009 and 2011. His time in that role has now ended.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It is not the case that there is a homogeneous, correct view of what is happening in XinjiangPeter Nolan, Jesus College, Cambridge<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But transcripts show that, as director of the college\u2019s China Centre, Nolan appeared to caution students who wanted to hold public debates about human rights abuses against Uyghurs in Xinjiang.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cYou have to have both views represented,\u201d he told the centre\u2019s advisory committee in November. \u201cOtherwise the college will be perceived as being a campaigning college for\u2026 freedom for the Weiwu\u2019ers [Uyghurs].\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nolan agreed that he could arrange an event, but said: \u201cIf you have both sides, it will be very difficult to contain the sentiment about such a meeting,\u201d which would not be \u201chelpful to advancing mutual understanding\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>He went on to say there was \u201cno simple answer\u201d to the situation with Uyghurs in Xinjiang. \u201cIt is not the case that there is a homogeneous, correct view of what is happening in Xinjiang. The predominant view\u2026 is that everybody knows what is happening. Everybody doesn\u2019t know what is happening.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The professor said that what he called the \u201cWorld Uyghur Association\u201d is \u201chighly organised, is very active and extremely well-represented in the global media\u201d and is indirectly funded by the US Congress, via the National Endowment for Democracy (NED).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201c[The NED\u2019s] purpose is regime change in China and other parts of the world,\u201d he said. \u201cSo that what you regard in the media as self-evidently true is actually a much more complicated question.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Nolan also told students that a public debate about Hong Kong \u201cwould be very difficult to contain\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cWe have a lot of mainland students,\u201d he said. \u201cIn this university, something organised about Hong Kong would be particularly highly contentious and very difficult to organise.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Speaking to the Sunday Times about openDemocracy\u2019s investigation, Iain Duncan Smith said: \u201c[Nolan] seems to be a mouthpiece for the CCP [Chinese Communist Party] \u2013 and all its appalling behaviour. All of those comments come straight from the mouth of the Communist Party.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>He added: \u201cHe can hold his opinions but what he shouldn\u2019t do is stifle everyone else\u2019s \u2013 and that is doing the CCP\u2019s job for it. That is utterly wrong and shouldn\u2019t be condoned.\u201d[Jesus College is] refusing to talk about these abuses of Uyghur Muslims for fear of causing offenceTom Tugendhat MP<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Speaking in Parliament earlier this year, Conservative MP Tom Tugendhat also accused Jesus College of \u201crefusing to talk about these abuses of Uyghur Muslims for fear of causing offence\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The MP, who is chair of the foreign affairs select committee, said: \u201cIs this the first time that Jesus himself has taken 30 pieces of silver? This is a deeply disappointing moment for all of us who believe in academic freedom in the UK.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Responding to this report, Nolan and Jesus College both said that no topic is out of bounds for academic discussion. They added that the China Centre has since hosted events on the Uyghurs and Hong Kong with a wide range of speakers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Students at Jesus College have also raised questions about a charity linked to the China Centre, the Cambridge China Development Trust, of which Nolan is a trustee.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The trust runs training programmes for Chinese officials and has received millions of pounds from large multinationals with financial interests in Chinese markets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Until 2019, it claimed the training was for the CEOs of Chinese state-owned companies, according to&nbsp;documents&nbsp;filed with the charity watchdog.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But the Foreign Office has now admitted that the programme has also been open to senior officials from \u201cgovernment departments in China\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Photos from Chinese government websites appear to show participants have included aerospace executives, policy gurus and senior Communist Party officials.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Participants in 2017 also appear to have included an executive at China General Nuclear Power Group. The company is involved in several high-profile nuclear energy projects in the UK which continue to be&nbsp;subject to questioning&nbsp;from politicians, the media and security experts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It would appear that there are a number of questions hanging over Jesus College and its links to the Chinese organisations in questionMartin Thorley, University of Exeter<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>According to&nbsp;academic references, the training programme is highly valued by an arm of the Chinese Communist Party and plays a \u201cvital role in China\u2019s interaction with global business\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cIt would appear that there are a number of questions hanging over Jesus College and its links to the Chinese organisations in question,\u201d says Martin Thorley, a research fellow at the University of Exeter who specialises in elite relations between China and the UK.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201c[Jesus College] might begin by releasing information about the internal discussions around the formation of these relationships, as well as disclosing the individuals and channels involved in initial negotiations with Chinese entities themselves.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Student campaign<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Students are now campaigning to raise awareness of these issues and to pressure Jesus College \u201cto ensure real academic freedom\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Aurelio Petrucci, former head of the college\u2019s student union, described Nolan\u2019s comments about Uyghurs as \u201cbeyond the pale\u201d and said Jesus College had \u201cconsistently behaved opaquely when asked for information or commitments to change\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThey have refused meetings to allow open student discussion of the issue with the College leadership, instead insisting that all engagement goes through the controlled environment of the China Centre Advisory Committee,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Students are also calling for full financial transparency over the college\u2019s ties to China and a commitment not to accept funding from the Chinese state or Huawei.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The campaign has received support from the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, a group bringing together&nbsp;nearly 200 legislators&nbsp;from 20 democracies around the world, including several dozen British MPs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cJesus College must come clean on its shadowy links to Chinese state-backed funders,\u201d the alliance\u2019s co-ordinator, Luke de Pulford, told openDemocracy. \u201cFailure to do so will only cast further doubt on the college\u2019s reputation. We cannot allow our world-leading universities to be bribed into silence on some of the most pressing debates of our time.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>\u2018No subject is out of bounds\u2019<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Responding to this investigation, Nolan said: \u201cI support Jesus College\u2019s position that no topic is out of bounds for academic discussion. At a College meeting last November, a group of academics and students debated the challenges inherent in organising balanced events on contentious topics. Since then the China Centre has hosted events covering topics including human rights, the Uyghurs, Hong Kong, and potential war with China, with speakers representing a wide range of opinions.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In a statement, Jesus College said it was \u201cstrongly committed to the principles of freedom of speech and academic independence.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It added: \u201cWe fully agree with Iain Duncan Smith that no opinion should be stifled. It is our position that no subject is out of bounds, as the range of recent events hosted by the College demonstrates. It is a bleak day if outside forces succeed in inhibiting academic debate.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Open Democracy.&nbsp;5 June 2021 Below is an article published by&nbsp;Open Democracy. Photo:Robert Evans \/ Alamy Stock Photo. ACambridge professor, who took a role allegedly funded by the family of China\u2019s former prime minister, has cautioned students against holding debates on<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[35],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dukva.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/698"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dukva.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dukva.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dukva.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dukva.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=698"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/dukva.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/698\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":699,"href":"https:\/\/dukva.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/698\/revisions\/699"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dukva.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=698"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dukva.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=698"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dukva.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=698"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}